See where students are headed before they get there.
Learn how ECRA’s predictive analytics empower administrators by helping to set goals, personalize learning, and ensure student success. Bring decisions into focus.
The Power of PredictionLearn how ECRA’s predictive analytics empower administrators by helping to set goals, personalize learning, and ensure student success. Bring decisions into focus.
The Power of PredictionLearn how ECRA’s prediction models produce effect sizes that connect actions to outcomes so that evaluating every program, every year, is a way of doing business.
Academic ROIECRA’s flagship School Improvement solution predicts student success, sets meaningful goals, and measures the gap between projected and actual results to quantify academic return on investment.
Explore School ImprovementECRA’s Data Briefs apply predictive modeling to publicly available data, making it easier than ever to benchmark your district’s performance and share progress through executive-level reports.
Explore Data BriefsBring your district’s plan for the future to life. ECRA’s Strategic Dashboard helps you share your strategies, monitor progress, and keep your board, community, and staff informed about what’s ahead.
Explore the Strategic Dashboard145StudentsCount
187ProjectedAverage Score
59%ProficiencyMeets Benchmark
+0.40GrowthEffect Size
The Comparative Analysis evaluates how a district or school performs relative to a selected group of peers. It compares key metrics such as student achievement, financial information, learning environment, and more. Visualizations, including bar charts and scatter plots, illustrate how the district or school compares to peer averages and individual districts or schools within the group. This report helps identify comparative strengths, gaps, and opportunities for improvement within a relevant peer context.
| Indicator | Peer Group Range | Sample School District | Peer 1 | Peer 2 | Peer 3 | Peer 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELA Proficiency | 61.3%48.773.1 | 61.3% | 52.4% | 66.8% | 48.7% | 73.1% |
| Math Proficiency | 45.6%33.459.8 | 45.6% | 39.4% | 51.2% | 33.4% | 59.8% |
| Science Proficiency | 61.8%49.371.2 | 61.8% | 55.1% | 66.4% | 49.3% | 71.2% |
| IAR ELA Growth Percentile | 57.347.257.3 | 57.3 | 49.8 | 53.1 | 47.2 | 56.4 |
| IAR Math Growth Percentile | 55.148.956.8 | 55.1 | 50.6 | 54.2 | 48.9 | 56.8 |
| HS Assessment ELA Growth Percentile | 52.649.158.3 | 52.6 | 51.4 | 55.7 | 49.1 | 58.3 |
| HS Assessment Math Growth Percentile | 49.547.657.1 | 49.5 | 50.2 | 54.8 | 47.6 | 57.1 |
| 8th Grade Students Passing Algebra I | 36.2%18.941.6 | 36.2% | 24.7% | 33.1% | 18.9% | 41.6% |
| 9th Grade on Track | 92.4%84.295.3 | 92.4% | 87.6% | 93.1% | 84.2% | 95.3% |
| HS 4-Year Graduation Rate | 91.5%85.994.6 | 91.5% | 88.3% | 92.7% | 85.9% | 94.6% |
| Graduates Enrolled in College Within 12 Months | 66.9%58.379.6 | 66.9% | 61.8% | 72.4% | 58.3% | 79.6% |
| Graduates Enrolled in College Within 16 Months | 68.7%60.181.3 | 68.7% | 63.5% | 74.2% | 60.1% | 81.3% |
| Community College Remediation | 21.2%14.831.7 | 21.2% | 26.4% | 19.7% | 31.7% | 14.8% |
Sample School District is above the peer average in ELA (61.3% vs. 60.5%) and science (61.8% vs. 60.8%) and slightly below it in math (45.6% vs. 45.9%). IAR ELA growth (57.3) is the highest among the listed districts, and the 4-year graduation rate (91.5% vs. 90.6%) exceeds the peer average.
| Indicator | Peer Group Range | Sample School District | Peer 1 | Peer 2 | Peer 3 | Peer 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average Teacher Salary | $74,210$66,390$87,630 | $74,210 | $69,850 | $81,420 | $66,390 | $87,630 |
| Average Administrator Salary | $118,640$99,870$141,320 | $118,640 | $104,280 | $132,560 | $99,870 | $141,320 |
| Local Property Tax | 58.4%41.872.3 | 58.4% | 46.2% | 67.9% | 41.8% | 72.3% |
| EAV Per Pupil | $212,480$142,590$384,210 | $212,480 | $168,340 | $318,760 | $142,590 | $384,210 |
| Instructional Spending Per Pupil | $11,240$9,720$13,450 | $11,240 | $10,310 | $12,680 | $9,720 | $13,450 |
| Operational Spending Per Pupil | $18,620$15,880$22,310 | $18,620 | $16,940 | $20,870 | $15,880 | $22,310 |
Teacher salaries ($74,210 vs. $75,900) and administrator salaries ($118,640 vs. $119,334) are both below peer averages. Instructional spending per pupil ($11,240 vs. $11,480) also trails peers, while reliance on local property tax (58.4% vs. 57.3%) is above average.
| Indicator | Peer Group Range | Sample School District | Peer 1 | Peer 2 | Peer 3 | Peer 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enrollment | 8,4203,98014,570 | 8,420 | 5,130 | 11,260 | 3,980 | 14,570 |
| Attendance | 93.4%91.694.8 | 93.4% | 94.1% | 92.2% | 91.6% | 94.8% |
| Mobility | 6.2%4.39.4 | 6.2% | 5.1% | 7.8% | 9.4% | 4.3% |
| Chronic Absenteeism | 19.6%13.827.1 | 19.6% | 16.2% | 23.4% | 27.1% | 13.8% |
| Truancy | 10.8%7.116.2 | 10.8% | 8.4% | 13.7% | 16.2% | 7.1% |
| Average Class Size | 21.420.623.3 | 21.4 | 22.1 | 20.6 | 23.3 | 22.8 |
| Teachers with Advanced Degrees | 68.3%54.876.9 | 68.3% | 61.7% | 72.4% | 54.8% | 76.9% |
| Teacher Retention | 91.2%84.993.1 | 91.2% | 88.6% | 87.3% | 84.9% | 93.1% |
Attendance (93.4% vs. 93.2%) is above the peer average, and chronic absenteeism (19.6% vs. 20.0%) is below it. Teacher retention (91.2% vs. 89.0%) and teachers with advanced degrees (68.3% vs. 66.8%) are both above peer averages.
| Indicator | Peer Group Range | Sample School District | Peer 1 | Peer 2 | Peer 3 | Peer 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White | 48.6%29.761.2 | 48.6% | 61.2% | 38.4% | 29.7% | 57.3% |
| Black | 11.2%5.118.6 | 11.2% | 6.4% | 14.8% | 18.6% | 5.1% |
| Hispanic | 27.4%17.841.2 | 27.4% | 21.3% | 33.6% | 41.2% | 17.8% |
| Asian | 8.1%5.315.6 | 8.1% | 7.2% | 9.4% | 5.3% | 15.6% |
| English Learner (EL) | 12.7%7.424.1 | 12.7% | 8.9% | 16.3% | 24.1% | 7.4% |
| Individual Education Plan (IEP) | 14.8%12.616.4 | 14.8% | 13.2% | 15.9% | 16.4% | 12.6% |
| Low Income | 31.6%16.852.7 | 31.6% | 22.4% | 38.9% | 52.7% | 16.8% |
| Homelessness | 1.2%0.62.4 | 1.2% | 0.8% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 0.6% |
Student demographics are close to the peer average. Low-income students (31.6% vs. 32.5%) and English Learners (12.7% vs. 13.9%) are both slightly below it, while the White share (48.6% vs. 47.0%) is slightly above.
Sample School District is the proud home of the Eagles. Covering 14 square miles, our 10 schools serve approximately 6,000 students from kindergarten through high school. With almost 200 teachers and staff, we strive to provide educational excellence in everything we do.
ECRA helps school districts increase student performance, reduce costs, and save administrators time.
For over 40 years, ECRA has partnered with school districts across the country, offering unmatched data science expertise to help school district leaders anticipate what’s next.
Our History











Test scores show where students have been. ECRA shows where they are headed and what to do about it, so every plan, program, and dollar moves students forward.
West Aurora School District 129 serves families who speak more than 44 languages across 15 schools. Associate Superintendent Brent Raby shares how ECRA’s predictive analytics and predicted growth checkpoints help teachers and school district leaders replace guesswork with targeted, purposeful instruction.
Read the Case StudyFrom K12 predictive analytics to district improvement, ECRA helps superintendents and other school leaders turn data into better decisions. Explore answers to common questions about our approach, our solutions, and how we partner with districts to help every student reach their potential.
Explore More FAQsECRA Group is a premier research and analytics consulting firm that uses predictive analytics to help school district leaders improve student outcomes through evidence-based practices. For over 40 years, ECRA has partnered with school districts across the country to predict student performance, set meaningful goals, and measure what works.
ECRA Group helps school districts use predictive analytics to estimate future student performance and identify opportunities for support. By identifying students earlier, ECRA’s predictive models help district leaders personalize learning, establish meaningful goals, monitor progress, and make more informed decisions about students, programs, and resources.
ECRA Group uses predictive analytics to help school districts establish meaningful goals for student growth and achievement. By calculating expected outcomes based on historical student performance, ECRA helps leaders set improvement goals that are both rigorous and realistic.
ECRA Group’s Academic ROI methodology helps school districts measure the effect of programs and interventions on student outcomes. By comparing actual student performance with the program to student performance without the program, districts can better understand whether an investment is producing meaningful results and use that evidence to guide future decisions.
ECRA helps school districts benchmark performance using publicly available state data. ECRA’s Data Briefs provide additional context around state results, helping leaders identify strengths, opportunities for improvement, and how their performance compares with peers.
Get ECRA insights, research, webinars, and resources for school district leaders delivered to your inbox.
You’re now connected with ECRA.